Home | About us | Products | Services | Projects |  | 

Your gateway:

FAIR sites:

Partner sites:

http://www.apressen.no/http://www.manpower.nohttp://www.flytoget.nohttp://www.jcdecaux.nohttp://www.fobsv.no/web/osthome1.nsfhttp://www.fredrikstad.kommune.nohttp://www.ntnu.nohttp://www.matforsk.nohttp://www.sv.nohttp://www.bkk.no/servlet/se.ementor.econgero.servlet.presentation.Main?data.node.id=4865&data.language.id=2http://www.sectoralarm.com/no/start/http://www.amnesty.nohttp://www.creditinform.nohttp://www.une.no/http://www.lindorff.nohttp://www.fhi.nohttp://www.arbeiderpartiet.nohttp://www.hoegh.com/hoegh/shipping/hoegh_autoliners/http://www.husbanken.no/

OLPC fails to answer concerns raised by FAIR


OLPC fails to give specific response to the concerns raised by FAIR, but chooses to continue with wrong and misleading information. In the conclusion of an article from OLPC News it is called for experts to please help them answer the critics. However, the concerns raised by FAIR are heavily supported by the foremost constructivist researchers in the world.

In specific the "conclusion" and "topics for further research" in the following article explain why young children preferreably should have a limited access to information technology:

Sand.pdf

Earlier articles on concerns about OLPC can be found here:

Widespread Keyboard Failures on OLPC

OLPC laptop shipments delayed

Accuses MIT and Negroponte of exploiting poor with OLPC

Scathing criticism from FAIR for “One Laptop Per Child”

Negroponte: Criticising OLPC is like Criticising the Church

 
About us | | | ©2006 Fair Allocation of Infotech Resources